Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:52:54 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: "Francisco Reyes" <fran@reyes.somos.net> Cc: "Jeff Wyman" <wysoft@wysoft.tzo.com>, "Vivek Khera" <khera@kciLink.com>, "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Kris Kennaway" <kris@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: why new buildkernel (was HEADS UP! Always use the 'make buildkernel' ..." Message-ID: <200007130452.WAA20878@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2000 02:00:59 EDT." <200007110601.CAA36394@vulcan.addy.com> References: <200007110601.CAA36394@vulcan.addy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200007110601.CAA36394@vulcan.addy.com> "Francisco Reyes" writes: : Why is this new procedure necessary. : I recall reading is because of some new additions, but what were : these additions (I have seen the name, but have no clue what : they are.. binutils?) and why the new, more cumbersome, : procedure? Because it is necessary. There's order dependencies that these targets take care of automatically. The binutils update forced it this time. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007130452.WAA20878>