From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 12 21:53:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FFA37B6BF; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 21:53:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA56773; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:53:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA20878; Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:52:54 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200007130452.WAA20878@harmony.village.org> To: "Francisco Reyes" Subject: Re: why new buildkernel (was HEADS UP! Always use the 'make buildkernel' ..." Cc: "Jeff Wyman" , "Vivek Khera" , "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" , "Kris Kennaway" In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jul 2000 02:00:59 EDT." <200007110601.CAA36394@vulcan.addy.com> References: <200007110601.CAA36394@vulcan.addy.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:52:54 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200007110601.CAA36394@vulcan.addy.com> "Francisco Reyes" writes: : Why is this new procedure necessary. : I recall reading is because of some new additions, but what were : these additions (I have seen the name, but have no clue what : they are.. binutils?) and why the new, more cumbersome, : procedure? Because it is necessary. There's order dependencies that these targets take care of automatically. The binutils update forced it this time. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message