From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:47:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0F216A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:47:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB3143D5F; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 95ABD5310; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:47:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 46B3F530A; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:47:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 098DBB873; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:47:09 +0200 (CEST) To: Wilko Bulte References: <200409280654.i8S6s2Kx057818@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040928071943.GC14942@ip.net.ua> <20040928113125.GA71032@freebie.xs4all.nl> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:47:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040928113125.GA71032@freebie.xs4all.nl> (Wilko Bulte's message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:31:25 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.64 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:47:16 -0000 Wilko Bulte writes: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:19:43AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote.. > > Then it's probably a right time to update stable-supfile in RELENG_5 > > as well, as was pointed out by someone on -current. > Not a good idea if you ask me. I'd rather rename that stable-supfile > into 4-stable-supfile and add a 5-stable-supfile. We don't want people > to unexpectedly to move to 5-stable or? the stable-supfile in 4.x won't change, so people running 4.x will keep getting 4.x, but people running 5.x will be able to use stable-supfile to track 5.x. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no