From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 04:48:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61ABC16A412 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:48:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD5E43CA3 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDA32E58F; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:48:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45822919.9030701@chapman.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:48:25 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kimi Ostro , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <42b497160612142042g32003891j9330b930622c8e64@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42b497160612142042g32003891j9330b930622c8e64@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: Poor NFS performance after recent update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:48:27 -0000 Kimi Ostro wrote: > I am have a realy big issue with NFS. I updated my fileserver to > -STABLE as of 13th December and suffering poor NFS performance. before > I was transferring data at around 6-8MBps now it is 30KBps - yes > 30KBps!!. also cause some mounted shares to lock up. > > I thought it was the nve0 interface and swapped it for an fxp0. no > change. checked cables. no change. > > What can I do to debug this further? > > I feel as though I could take the binary bits and transfer them > quicker myself :( > What's the entry for the NFS share in /etc/fstab? -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Processes running slowly due to weak power supply