From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Mar 29 11:23:08 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA13463
          for questions-outgoing; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sxt2.space.lockheed.com (sxt2.space.lockheed.com [192.68.162.109])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA13458
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:23:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by sxt2.space.lockheed.com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA08500; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:17:21 -0800
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 11:17:20 -0800 (PST)
From: "Brian N. Handy" <handy@sxt2.space.lockheed.com>
To: Guy Helmer <ghelmer@alpha.dsu.edu>
Cc: owensc <owensc@enc.edu>,
        questions list FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: orphaned proccess hogging CPU (e.g. pine)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.92.960329111941.2681B-100000@alpha.dsu.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.91.960329111607.8068E-100000@sxt2.space.lockheed.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I haven't seen either of these problems in pine 3.92 (just released), but
> I added my patch back into pine/signals.c just in case :-)  I'm not sure
> if the FreeBSD port/mail/pine patches will apply to 3.92, though.

Nope.  I tried it a couple of days ago, and it's not a drop-in 
replacement for the pine port.  A bunch of stuff seems to have changed, 
and I haven't had the time/ability to see what it takes to make the new 
one work.

Brian