From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 10 08:40:53 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA18153 for current-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 08:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.nai.net (usa.nai.net [204.71.21.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA18086; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 08:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chris.nai.net (chris.nai.net [204.71.21.7]) by usa.nai.net (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA21780; Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:36:52 -0400 Message-ID: <31BC4136.2386@nai.net> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 1996 11:37:26 -0400 From: Chris Lukas Reply-To: chris@usa.nai.net Organization: NAI X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b4Gold (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaye Mathisen CC: Paul Traina , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What about... was: Re: -Stable, credit card donations to FreeBSD, Inc. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jaye Mathisen wrote: > > I think Paul's analysis vastly oversimplifies the issue. Anybody could > take a CD, and offer it at a cheaper price. Doesn't mean they'll sell > enough of them to dent walnut creek. > > Perhaps WC could stick a sticker on the box that says "Some amount of > money from this sale goes to furthering development". > > Or a higher-priced subscription plan. > > Or how about selling access to an "exclusive" mailing list, that is shared > with the developers? > > I would pay money if my technical issue questions, as opposed to generic > "anybody seen a ...." questions were sent directly to the developers, and > I *knew* that it was followed by the developers. Even if not acted upon. > ... > Too many times, I see the hardcore developers talk about avoiding reading > the lists, because it consumes too much time... I'd pay to be on a list > that they would always attempt to read... > > Or tie the mailing list in with a higher priced FreeBSD subscription plan. > > The bean-counters here have a hard time with "donation", but wouldn't > blink 2x if it was called a "support list", or whatever. It would be no > different than purchasing a Mickey Soft Developer Network subscription. ... > Frankly, a paid subscription list may work better for the developers > anyway. Somebody's paying money to be on the list, the implication being > that they think enough of the product to pay for the list, so it would > behoove a developer to at least take a gander at the issue/problem, in > order to keep the $$$'s rolling in that would hopefully pay somebody else > to do menial work that the developer is currently having to do, instead of > hacking on FreeBSD. > I wholeheartedly agree. I actually find it difficult to base my business on a product that some is NOT making money on. Who is going to run the paid subscription list, and do the developers agree? (reverse order). Chris Lukas