From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 27 00:15:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4914537B40F for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:15:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE1144104 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:10:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0033.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.33] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18ySTQ-00055x-00; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:10:56 -0800 Message-ID: <3E82B1B8.65D4375B@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 00:09:28 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Sizemore References: <200303260034.aa92057@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <3E81160B.E5406C60@mindspring.com> <20030326035938.GF1713@dan.emsphone.com> <3E816243.AED1CB4F@mindspring.com> <20030327070317.GA19434@math.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a41b48f4e1465cdc45d1947e0b06718496667c3043c0873f7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-21.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Re: NFS -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:15:13 -0000 Steve Sizemore wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:18:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > In fact, the only legitimate argument I have ever heard for UDP > > has been "I have an old Linux install that can't talk TCP, as > > only UDP was implemented at the time I installed it". > > Have you already forgotten the locking problem that you were > helping me with last week? The only solution was to use UDP. Working around a screwed up implementation is not a "legitimate" argument. The only legitimate argument to that is "unscrewing" the implementation. 8-). -- Terry