Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:45:22 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X11R6.8.2 can't be compiled in 5.3 Release? Message-ID: <200504131845.28242.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20050413063321.4F1931D969@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com> References: <20050413063321.4F1931D969@imss.sgp.fujixerox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart44537575.p7K9mT7qIK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 13. April 2005 08:41, Xu Qiang wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > You should be building X.Org from the ports collection, or just using > > current binary packages. X.Org releases are set up to require > > software that we provide through ports rather than building (older > > version of) them itself. > > But in company, the connection to outside is limited to HTTP protocol. In > this case, I don't think ports can be used. Yes you can: The sysutils/portsnap port/package fetches and updates=20 ports-trees over http. > You mean we can't directly build the X Window system from X11R6.8.2 src > distribution?=20 Of course you can, but we only support the ports/packages. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart44537575.p7K9mT7qIK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCXUyoXhc68WspdLARAiM+AKCkyJyQM1d7hJ0JlJqEcjtUPcSZ7QCfblWR oki/ZR6GWTxDN4ZtkFtpLEc= =MiMj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart44537575.p7K9mT7qIK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200504131845.28242.michaelnottebrock>