From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 4 02:00:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2242616A419 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 02:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF98513C4D1 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 02:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id lB41XXkU029085; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 20:33:33 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:33:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 20:33:33 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: David Xu In-Reply-To: <200712040130.lB41U3rv095165@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <200712040130.lB41U3rv095165@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads/72429: threads blocked in stdio (fgets, etc) are not cancellable in 5.3 (works in 4.x) X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 02:00:28 -0000 On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, David Xu wrote: > The following reply was made to PR threads/72429; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: David Xu > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, mark@verniernetworks.com > Cc: > Subject: Re: threads/72429: threads blocked in stdio (fgets, etc) are not > cancellable in 5.3 (works in 4.x) > Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 09:27:45 +0800 > > Should we close the PR now ? since POSIX does not say stdio routines > are cancellation points. the libc_r happened to support it, it is lucky, > but may cause problems too. Yes! -- DE