Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:53:59 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Daniel Gerzo <danger@rulez.sk> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re[2]: docs/67893: [patch] boot(8)'s -m description is insufficient. Message-ID: <20060419014821.S73773@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <1142977415.20060418234409@rulez.sk> References: <200604181900.k3IJ0rUC075126@freefall.freebsd.org> <44455CCF.7060106@FreeBSD.org> <1142977415.20060418234409@rulez.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, 23:44+0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello Doug, > > Tuesday, April 18, 2006, 11:40:31 PM, you wrote: > > > My understanding is that when something is committed to HEAD, the > > state of the PR should be changed to patched, and then closed when > > the fix is MFC'ed, is that no longer the case, or is my > > understanding wrong? > > I would say, that it's still the way you wrote, but I noticed that > not all commiters follow this rule :/ > > (FYI i'm not commiter, so I might be wrong, although I recall reading > that somewhere, possibly on /internal/ pages.) Send a complain to core@ and they remove my commit bit from access ;-) Actually, I don't get it as a strict rule. I used to use "patched" state as an MFC reminder for the critical from my POV PRs. For all other I have different mechanism. And trust me, I don't forget to MFC this change to RELENG_6. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060419014821.S73773>