From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 7 19:32:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52B116A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:32:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA5843D4C for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:32:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E25CF18E0; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07002-08; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.199.45.54] (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB78F1803; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 12:32:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: References: <20041002144347.GA66319@enemy.org> <20041002192307.GC66319@enemy.org> <20041003011653.GA76597@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20041004095514.GA12643@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-SzQxXdO9dzSMplTnLZed" Message-Id: <1097177572.4190.44.camel@server> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 12:32:52 -0700 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64 on Asus K8V SE Deluxe X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 19:32:53 -0000 --=-SzQxXdO9dzSMplTnLZed Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 12:20, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, David Kleiner wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > > > Do these interfaces have TXCSUM on? I know there is a problem with t= hat > > > on the re but it only really effects udp. Sounds like you are having > > > issues with tcp. If it is on it wouldn't hurt to try turning it off. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Sean > > > > > > > Not sure but I'm probably not looking in the right places: > ... > > Is there anywhere else I can look? >=20 > ifconfig sk0 txcsum > ifconfig sk0 -txcsum >=20 > but imho if_sk does not support txcsum so ifconfig sk0 txcum should > give you invalid argument. This was just a wild suggestion as I get hangups with udp on re. I'm pretty sure this has nothing to do with the sk0 or the issue you are seeing. I was just suggesting it for giggles to see if there was some extremely remote possible connection with hardware transmit checksum offloading. If the device doesn't support txcsum, then doing this would be completely moot. Amazed that a gigE device doesn't have that capability. Cheers, Sean --=-SzQxXdO9dzSMplTnLZed Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBZZnkyQsGN30uGE4RAjzBAJ4n+1lD6Bet31C8gFgpE4rAZQZjBgCg3Prk hxLjkNe4KQCNuS9Hj5qC4sM= =8KjG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SzQxXdO9dzSMplTnLZed--