From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 8 17:28:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132B516A41F for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:28:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from mail-yellow.research.att.com (mail-dark.research.att.com [192.20.225.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC67643D46 for ; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:28:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from bright.research.att.com (bright.research.att.com [135.207.20.189]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EFC147B03; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:28:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by bright.research.att.com (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id j98HSSmZ023547; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:28:28 -0700 From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <200510081728.j98HSSmZ023547@bright.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: Kris Kennaway References: <20051008003731.GA3447@k7.mavetju> <20051008023628.GA57290@xor.obsecurity.org> <200510080611.j986BNwg008692@bright.research.att.com> <20051008155408.GA73976@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:28:28 -0700 Versions: dmail (linux) 2.7/makemail 2.14 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another administrative variable: NOFETCHFILES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 17:28:29 -0000 >Can you find another example? stonx is now fetchable. Edwin pointed to multimedia/pvr250 in his original email; I was just suggesting that this is not a new problem; ports have had to solve it in their own way for at least 6 years. The general answer seems to be creative use of IGNORE, which is so overloaded it's just sad. Bill