Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:37:50 +0200 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@mail.lifanov.com> Cc: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r251886 - in head: contrib/apr contrib/apr-util contrib/serf contrib/sqlite3 contrib/subversion share/mk usr.bin usr.bin/svn usr.bin/svn/lib usr.bin/svn/lib/libapr usr.bin/svn/lib/libap... Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnJSbdbSGwchRKQWKtcV%2BFULYBGKgGH6RCaXRMPgWb2Sw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51C090CD.3040102@mail.lifanov.com> References: <201306180253.r5I2rj45053959@svn.freebsd.org> <51C08D7E.2000605@coosemans.org> <51C08F58.2070308@freebsd.org> <51C090CD.3040102@mail.lifanov.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@mail.lifanov.com> wrote: > It's net/svnup and is a great replacement for cvs, in my opinion. > CVS wasn't used for development for a long while anyway, so there is nothing > subversion is replacing that net/svnup wouldn't. svnup still has a number of issues: both performance and stability (it tends to randomly core dump). I've stated before that I intended to import svnup when it became ready. I have no intention in taking part in whatever debate may happen here. Should we decide that we want 'svn lite' instead of svnup I am happy. Should we decide to use svnup, I am still happy to import it. -- Eitan Adler Source, Ports, Doc committer Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnJSbdbSGwchRKQWKtcV%2BFULYBGKgGH6RCaXRMPgWb2Sw>