Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 01:59:00 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: Steve Sizemore <steve@cmpharm.ucsf.edu> Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which version to run Message-ID: <62436.921664740@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:07:53 PST." <19990315100753.A87394@cmpharm.ucsf.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> install, I had to use a 4.0 snapshot. However, I'd really rather > track stable (since that's what I use on my intel machines), if that > is possible. Is 3.1 stable really stable for the alpha platform, or > do I need to use current? It might be better to track -current just for a little while, at least until 3.1-stable catches up for the alpha. I don't think it's actually diverged all that much at all; Doug? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?62436.921664740>