From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 16 22:40:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB15316A41F for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net [207.246.149.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC33543D45 for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:40:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpk@dpk.net) Received: from shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7GMearR092468; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dpk@localhost) by shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id j7GMeaSU092465; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net: dpk owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:40:36 -0700 (PDT) From: dpk X-X-Sender: dpk@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net To: Carstea Catalin In-Reply-To: <20050816122552.V18668@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> Message-ID: <20050816153816.F18668@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> References: <20050816122552.V18668@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:40:48 -0000 On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, dpk wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Carstea Catalin wrote: > > > what version of freebsd do u recomand for a stable server? > > 4.11 is solid, hasn't shown any problems here. 5.4 is the best of the 5.x > series but we (I mean at my company, not speaking as a FreeBSD rep) > haven't put it through as much stress as we have 4.11 . I forgot to mention the other reason I recommend 4.11 first: http://www.freebsd.org/security/index.html 4.11-R is scheduled to receive security updates 8 months longer than 5.4-R, which may be relevant if you want to stick with a specific version for a while.