Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:43:12 +0200 From: Adi Pircalabu <apircalabu@bitdefender.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: pkg-plist strict enforcement starting Message-ID: <20050114154312.57462980@apircalabu.dsd.ro> In-Reply-To: <20050114132925.GM69532@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20050113062739.GA28658@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501131148520.25402-100000@pancho> <20050113180504.GA26064@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050114130404.250d6e26@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <20050114112918.GF69532@voodoo.oberon.net> <1105704398.41e7b5ce7dc5e@buexe.b-5.de> <20050114132925.GM69532@voodoo.oberon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:29:25 +0100 Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> wrote: > > > It's better to use ~/.your_port directory in such cases. > > > > For system-wide defaults? > > For files which should be changed/deleted/added etc while software is > running. Oops, then what if there are files changed/deleted/added during runtime which must reside in, let's say, port's base directory? How can I treat these files? Should I enfore deletion from pkg-deinstall or pkg-plist? -- Adrian Pircalabu Public KeyID = 0xF902393A -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050114154312.57462980>