From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Feb 21 19:07:09 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id TAA22819 for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 19:07:09 -0800 Received: from specgw.spec.co.jp (specgw.spec.co.jp [202.32.13.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA22808 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 19:07:03 -0800 Received: from localhost (amurai@localhost) by specgw.spec.co.jp (8.6.5/3.3Wb-SPEC) id MAA26790; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 12:03:32 +0900 From: Atsushi MURAI Message-Id: <199502220303.MAA26790@specgw.spec.co.jp> Subject: Re: Bug in ppp packet filter (and fix!) To: Andrew.Gordon@net-tel.co.uk Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 12:03:32 +0900 (JST) Cc: bugs@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <"MAC-950220002210-359B*/G=Andrew/S=Gordon/O=Net-Tel Computer from "Andrew.Gordon@net-tel.co.uk" at Feb 20, 95 00:20:37 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 725 Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Bug in: /usr/sbin/ppp > Version: SNAP-950210, and source of about 2 days ago > Detail: The 'set ifilter'/'set ofilter' commands accept a syntax containing > IP addresses and/or protocol+port, but in the case where both are > supplied, it happily accepts the command but ignores the proto+port > It also attempts to handle the case where the second IP address > is omitted, but this doesn't work. > > Fix: > > In src/usr.sbin/ppp/filter.c: Got you. After confirmation with author, I will handle this for both -development and latest porting based ver0.94. Thanks. -- Atsushi Murai Email : amurai@spec.co.jp SPEC Voice : +81-3-3833-5341 System Planning and Engineering Corp.