From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 8 05:14:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68481065672; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mx1.esiee.fr (mx1.esiee.fr [147.215.1.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D888FC12; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:14:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73DB136873; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VAMS.dummy (Postfix) with SMTP id BD2433D18D; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784B13D18D; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (chs77-1-82-238-8-126.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.8.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A5CAE7AA8; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 07:14:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <49DC32B8.8060000@esiee.fr> Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:14:33 +0200 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ewald Jenisch References: <49DB0B07.1030703@esiee.fr> <20090407141239.GA4757@aurora.oekb.co.at> In-Reply-To: <20090407141239.GA4757@aurora.oekb.co.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ivan Voras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migration to 7.1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:14:43 -0000 Ewald Jenisch wrote: >>> Does the LAGG driver works well with broadcomm giga ethernet chips ? >>> ( I plan to use LACP to a Cisco switch ) >> Try asking at freebsd-net@ >> > > Hi, > > I've been running with the lagg-driver for quite some time now on > several blade-systems using broadcom chips in a failover > configuration - no problems whatsoever - failover/fallback all ok. > > LACP shouldn't be a problem either - on the Cisco side define a port > channel using LACP plus optional a balancing strategy (like mac-based etc.) > > HTH > -ewald > Hello Thanks for your feedback Frank > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"