Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:57:24 -0500 From: "Steven Ames" <steve@virtual-voodoo.com> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Fax=E9r?= <gmh003532@brfmasthugget.se>, "Wilko Bulte" <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable Message-ID: <015401c1b011$aa17e5b0$28d90c42@eservoffice.com> References: <no.id><20020207101501.A89056@fit.vutbr.cz><20020207190807.A19376@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20020207194803.389b17ec.gmh003532@brfmasthugget.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 19:08:07 +0100 > Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > There is another common source of confusion: If anybody has IDE > > > disks, write-caching is enabled by default in -stable, but disabled > > > in -current. > > > > I don't think that is true anymore. -stable has WC enabled as well. > > -STABLE has it enabled indeed, but -CURRENT does not (afaik). > Read what he said. :-) I believe that hw.ata.wc is set to '0' by default. Easily correctible either by adding 'hw.ata.wc="1"' into your /boot/loader.conf or tweaking the source in /usr/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c (the former being the preferred method of course). -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?015401c1b011$aa17e5b0$28d90c42>