Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 07:38:58 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, lists@rewt.org.uk Subject: Re: Proposal Message-ID: <201404100638.s3A6cwxF057730@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <5345C98D.7030907@rewt.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 23:28:29 +0100 >From: Joe Holden <lists@rewt.org.uk> >To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Proposal > >The problem here is that a workaround wasn't communicated and I suspect >a very small number of religous users actually sub to security@ I do read it. > - also >bare in mmind that the website wasn't updated until a number of hours >after, including rss which I suspect most people use. I don't use rss >I am not trying to undermine the required testing here, but a simple >binary patch via freebsd-update to disable heartbeats would have done in >the interim (who even uses them, or knows about them). not for me. I much prefer a verified security advisory. Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201404100638.s3A6cwxF057730>