From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 20:38:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C18E5C5 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336E01E5B for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s81Kc4oN009271 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 20:38:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193215] [stage] net/balance request maintainership Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:38:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Issue Resolved X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 20:38:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193215 --- Comment #4 from John Marino --- No. I prefer "and request maintainership" in the title. I've changed your titles quite a few times and those changes serve as examples. I assume you got notices showing the title change. So ideally you would notice these changes which show 1) what not to do and 2) what to do instead. but in this case I explicitly pointed it out. "[maintainer]" means the current maintainer opened the PR, not somebody that wants to be a maintainer. It's a way of establishing credibility quickly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.