Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 11:02:30 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Busarow <dan@dpcsys.com> To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk> Cc: Graeme Tait <U@webcom.com>, "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Cluster Size Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990110110120.153B-100000@java.dpcsys.com> In-Reply-To: <3698F24A.EA588E91@tdx.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Karl Pielorz wrote: > Graeme Tait wrote: > > It's worked fine for me so far. The server with the modified filesystem has not > > yet gone into production, but it hasn't missed a beat. I can't say I've > > stressed the modified filesystem a lot, except for repeatedly tarring, > > untarring and deleting ~700,000 ~1.5k files, which occupy a 3-tier directory > > structure (for reasons of filesystem efficiency). I've tried various > > combinations of > > > > -f 512/1024/2048 > > -b 8*frag size > > -i 1024/2048/4096 > > I'm sure it cropped up in -current / -hackers a while ago... Maybe it's only > 3.0 relevant... I'll see if I can dig up anything... The newfs man page mentions that / has to be 8k/1k or the kernel gets upset. Could that be it? Dan -- Dan Busarow 949 443 4172 Dana Point Communications, Inc. dan@dpcsys.com Dana Point, California 83 09 EF 59 E0 11 89 B4 8D 09 DB FD E1 DD 0C 82 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990110110120.153B-100000>