Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 23:32:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208001] After turning off the jail does not remove network routes Message-ID: <bug-208001-6-MbKLgr3cIG@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208001-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208001-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208001 Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jamie@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #3 from Jamie Gritton <jamie@FreeBSD.org> --- I suspect the problem lies in the "/24" of "re0|10.0.0.22/24". Jail aliases are almost always going to use the /32 netmask, which is the default if one isn't specified. From what I see of your netstat output, your primary addr= ess is on the 10.0.0.0/24 subnet. The only time you'd want a non-/32 subnet on= a jail is if your set aside a separate subnet used only for that jail. Note this instruction from the "alias" section of ifconfig(8): "If the address is on the same subnet as the first network address for this interface, a non-conflicting netmask must be given. Usually 0xffffffff is = most appropriate." In any case, I was unable to reproduce this behavior. I don't know all the parameters of your setup, but it looks like you should just remove those netmasks. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208001-6-MbKLgr3cIG>