Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:38:41 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 [Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast] Message-ID: <426D5551.4090707@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <p0621020cbe930300304b@[128.113.24.47]> References: <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424210422.03d22990@64.7.153.2> <20050425014453.GA59981@xor.obsecurity.org> <426C6B1D.3040704@elischer.org> <20050425061459.GA33247@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050425062106.GB91852@voodoo.oberon.net> <426CF3DE.4000409@samsco.org> <20050425160146.4795fe1b.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <426CF91A.8060907@samsco.org> <20050425144259.GL91852@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050425182033.GC40370@xor.obsecurity.org> <p0621020cbe930300304b@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn wrote: > For what it's worth: Some friends of mine are claiming that "Tiger" > (MacOS 10.4) will be coming with gcc 4.0. And Tiger is already > shipping, although the official release date isn't until this Friday. Yes, it's public knowledge that the Tiger Dev tools are based on GCC 4.0. > > I'm not saying that we should switch to it because of that, but I'm > just mentioning it as an interesting data point (assuming it is true!). > This would be a good reason to switch if our primary platform was PowerPC and Objective C, since I'm sure that Apple has given those a very good workout. But for i386, amd64, and sparc64, there might not have been as much good exposure yet. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426D5551.4090707>