From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 16:11:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DB316A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:11:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BD243D54 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:11:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0LGB9F7030925 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:11:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: current@freebsd.org From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:11:09 +0100 Message-ID: <30924.1106323869@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Subject: Anybody involved with ISO C standardization ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:11:11 -0000 I just read another brain-dead proposal for a new timeformat which appearantly is in the ISO C queue and I would really like if we can avoid having another damn mistake in that area. (http://david.tribble.com/text/c0xlongtime.html) If we have anybody who's actively involved in the ISO C standardization who are willing to push and champion a a proposal that makes sense then I would love to hear from them. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.