From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 18 2: 7:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from sentinel.office1.bg (sentinel.office1.bg [195.24.48.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A31DB37B4C5 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:06:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 75567 invoked by uid 1001); 18 Oct 2000 09:07:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 12:07:13 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Sean Kelly Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/20665: [PATCH] Update PORTVERSION for JadeTeX port Message-ID: <20001018120713.B72802@ringwraith.office1.bg> References: <200010171730.KAA85226@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010171730.KAA85226@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kelly@ad1440.net on Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:30:02AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:30:02AM -0700, Sean Kelly wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/20665; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Sean Kelly > To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/20665: [PATCH] Update PORTVERSION for JadeTeX port > Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:51 -0700 > > OK, I guess I should be glad there are anal retentive people working for the > good of FreeBSD. :-) In the audit-trail, ade wrote: > > > This patch is incomplete. You've bumped the port version number > > in the makefile, but have not provided an updated files/md5, > > D'oh! The diff for files/md5 is below. Thanks for noticing this. [snip] > > > nor checked to see if there are PLIST (or other) changes that need > > to be made. > > And you drive a pickle wagon. Of course, I have no proof of this, just as > you don't that I didn't check for PLIST or other changes that need to be > made. > > And no, the PLIST doesn't need updating. Actually, now you may need to send a whole new patch, what with the new ports layout - filenames have changed, and several committers have mentioned on the mailing list that PR's and patches referencing old-style files shall most probably be silently ignored. It's basically just a case of editing your old patch file and changing several filenames, but it should make the committers' lives a bit easier :) G'luck, Peter -- This sentence claims to be an Epimenides paradox, but it is lying. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message