Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 10:12:18 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile Message-ID: <43017.1062490338@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Sep 2003 14:57:26 %2B0700." <20030902075726.GB72639@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20030902075726.GB72639@regency.nsu.ru>, Alexey Dokuchaev writes: >On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:50:23AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> > NOATM and NOINET6 were preexisting options, and rather than start >> > the "1.0 compatibility at any cost!" bikeshed I simply have propagated >> > them to other relevant places. >> >> The last few times this came up, the consensus was for WORD_SEPERATORS >> in new options. > >I second this consensus. >Does anyone consider renaming those knobs that we don't have to rely on >being particularly named for compatibility with older FreeBSD versions? >(Just wondering.) The crucial word here is "_new_ options", these were existing options. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43017.1062490338>