From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 16 04:31:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA05613 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:31:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id EAA05561 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:30:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA10430; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:17:48 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199812161017.LAA10430@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: IPFW screwed up? To: brian@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (Brian W. Buchanan) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 11:17:47 +0100 (MET) Cc: forrie@forrie.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "Brian W. Buchanan" at Dec 15, 98 02:58:20 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > > Something's really wrong with ipfw... this is what my rules end up looking > > like, and no changes have ever been made: > > Are your kernel and /sbin/ipfw in sync? It appears that some changes have > been made to the ipfw userland<->kernel interface. correct -- the recent inclusion of dummynet requires one to recompile ipfw. cheers luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message