From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Jan 17 10:31:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A31D148E284; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=JHsv=PZ=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from orval.bbpf.belspo.be (orval.bbpf.belspo.be [193.191.208.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C89F86944; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=JHsv=PZ=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from mordor.lan (213.219.145.216.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net [213.219.145.216]) by orval.bbpf.belspo.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B6A31D4FC18; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:30:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:30:43 +0100 From: Julien Cigar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Supermicro HBA Message-ID: <20190117103043.GA44618@mordor.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0C89F86944 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SRS0=JHsv=PZ=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be designates 193.191.208.90 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SRS0=JHsv=PZ=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[perdition.city]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.26)[0.256,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.21)[asn: 2611(-1.06), country: BE(0.00)]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.bebif.be,mx2.bebif.be]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[90.208.191.193.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[julien@perdition.city,SRS0=JHsv=PZ=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[216.145.219.213.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2611, ipnet:193.191.192.0/19, country:BE]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[julien@perdition.city,SRS0=JHsv=PZ=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:31:03 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, We are planning to replace some (web) applications servers (currently running HPE) with Supermicro and the vendor offers the following=20 choices for the Hardware Raid Controller/HBA 4P part: 1) Supermicro AOC-S3008L-L8E, LSI 3008 8 x SATA/SAS III JBOD controller, up to 122 hard drives via expander backplane, PCI-E, ideal for Nexenta/ZFS + =E2=82=AC 205,6 2) LSI 9300-4I, SATA/SAS III JBOD controller, tot 256 harde schijven via expander backplanes, PCI-E, ideal for Nexenta/ZFS + =E2=82=AC 214,5 3) LSI MegaRAID 9341-4i bulk, 4 x SATA/SAS 12Gbs internal entry level hardware RAID, no cache/BBU possible, PCI-e + =E2=82=AC 177,97 4) LSI MegaRAID 9361-4i 1GB cache, 4 x SATA/SAS 12Gbs internal hardware RAID, max. 240 hdd using expander backplanes + =E2=82=AC 401,7 5) LSI 9300-4i4e, SATA/SAS III JBOD controller, 4 x internal, 4 x external, up to 256 hard drives via expander backplane, Nexenta Certified, ideal for ZFS, PCI-E + =E2=82=AC 273,95 6) LSI MegaRAID 9380-4i4e bulk, 8 x SATA/SAS 12Gbs, 4 x external and 4 x internal hardware RAID, 1024MB cache, up to 128 hard drives via expander backplane, support for SSD CacheCade 2.0 write and read caching, CacheVault support (advised), ideal for high en + =E2=82=AC 676 As the plan is to use ZFS, I was planning to choose the=20 "Supermicro AOC-S3008L-L8E, LSI 3008" (it looks like it is supported by mpr) and I was wondering if anyone has any feedback on it ? Would another option be a better choice ? Thank you! Julien --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE7vn2l0to0nV7EWolsrs3EKIEI8AFAlxAWVAACgkQsrs3EKIE I8B2vw//VFo5enp9QXEITZUQil5rcnfoFnHm9RntxytWP5k1/PW7Ia/V2DcWAqgk rPa0Eti7BIzZ3xhUb9fBSqTjpb090/PnknF4M0ossY7T17VCFuAEcvA1SWTD64ez p2m9itE3/GsrEOlLKiJjVuqVjhzWha+CYu6ooCzJmCs8+voHbkBr7RXGUYpwY+Zu wPvSkV9g6tIB8uv4opXovN4fR9Owc2EnYH3PuHFC3iUVQMephlt0wDRui5KrtcSK ROCzyXi3R1D8xKLxLBOIf6xNqXgbZxcVtzT/u/181q8ucAyk8nfO5qdZ5DkX0/0M obk4nDpdt6SB2hFtUNGGBOGVlpEzK3Jr8d85dS/aRGS3FPMcjKS+3VheG6dOiUIu 8aSqKzsXblbSvWIFfuIBQRpRNvJkWr3XXcoxRunHdb+9Z82zZspDaosiDoztyq9L bX5hyp+0w4v6ah7SdNxQv760Qbly2JdyM1KpZxNWt7lp1DBuvAg8OHCgpiQWFfCq Vs0+ChILBFdAEtynU8F9n6EH0XKVtxiAcopHKCsuOuW173Vmx6gmbhsHPDrKYUWX QUj6RyHxhqeTyLsX/LykVZHv3OdiTl5g7Pen5H77SCmsBf6ZqjiUmia9H07G2s+T 3VW7Hb/0JuTsyKvVTjVIeoQuAjnHlNdOWQTz0hXJnggsS8OyM0Y= =8dEM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--