Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 21:04:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Howard Lew <hlew@www2.shoppersnet.com> To: spork <spork@super-g.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More Intel 10/100 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970718210053.29226D-100000@www2.shoppersnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970718133755.25471A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jul 1997, spork wrote:
> I'd seen some traffic in the archives about the "unsupported PHY, type =
> 7" messages with the Intel card, and I see that after I booted a
> 2.2-stable kernel these went away:
>
> Jul 17 06:08:19 test /kernel.GENERIC: fxp0: Ethernet address
> 00:a0:c9:5c:e5:84
> Jul 17 06:08:21 test /kernel.GENERIC: fxp0: warning: unsupported PHY, type
> = 7, addr = 1
> Jul 17 06:35:21 test /kernel: fxp0 <Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B
> Ethernet> rev 2 int a irq 10 on pci0:11
> Jul 17 06:35:21 test /kernel: fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:5c:e5:84
>
> So are all the various Intel "fxp" cards supported, regardless of which
> chip is used? I'm just curious, as it seems like at some point the Intel
> won out over the Digital as the "preffered" 10/100 card for FBSD. We're
> dying to standardize on one card througout our shop...
>
> TIA,
>
> Charles
>
Hmmm... I'm using a 3.0-970606-snap with a rev 1 model in 10Base-T mode
and have never seen such a message or had such a problem. It maybe
specific to rev 2 models.
Probe says:
fxp0: <Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet> rev 0x01 int a irq 11 on
pci0.9.0
fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:39:19:42
found-> vendor=0xedd8, dev=0xa0a1, revid=0x00
class=03-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
map[0]: type 3, range 32, base e0000000, size 23
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970718210053.29226D-100000>