From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 19 10:47:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33414906; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A1D121AC; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:47:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC522438BD; Thu, 19 Jun 2014 05:47:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53A2BF90.9020403@marino.st> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:46:40 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman , marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r358364 - in head/misc: . valspeak References: <201406190824.s5J8Ol4D091003@svn.freebsd.org> <53A2A4C0.3050902@freebsd.org> <53A2A75E.9060507@marino.st> <53A2B3EA.9050701@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <53A2B3EA.9050701@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:47:21 -0000 On 6/19/2014 11:56, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > These talkfilters are all fairly simple lex-based filter programs that > make amusing substitutions in any piece of text fed through them. ie. a > bunch of fairly small binaries. > > Unless the valspeak you just committed is different to the one in > talkfilters -- which is entirely possible: IIRC these programs have been > floating around the net since before the millenium, probably evolved a > bit during that time -- then I don't think there's anything much to be > gained from a separate port. > Hi Matthew, There seems to be some valid rationale for having a separate package. I added you to that discussion so I won't continue it here. Thanks, John