Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 02:56:57 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current <current@freebsd.org>, Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com> Subject: Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for 2006 ) Message-ID: <20051223085657.GF63497@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <200512230851.jBN8pFVv060458@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <200512231136.12471.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200512230851.jBN8pFVv060458@hugo10.ka.punkt.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:51:15AM +0100 I heard the voice of
Patrick M. Hausen, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> Any suggestions for an alternative to NFS if your 'client' servers
> are located "all over the world" and you want to installworld across
> the Internet? I was planning to use NFS/TCP secured by IPSec
> transport mode, but anything less complicated would be greatly
> appreciated ;-)
This is one of the situations where r{dist,sync}'ing out the binaries
makes more sense than NFS mounting and running installworld (which
would be awful awful slow, above and beyond security and convenience
issues).
--
Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051223085657.GF63497>