Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 13:21:04 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com> Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jails in different private subnets on the same host Message-ID: <20160520112104.GM15034@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <573349b9-b10d-e976-6d41-1118f5de4b2c@gjunka.com> References: <faf9e698-baee-f988-df64-5bcda4b1c7c9@gjunka.com> <AF80A4F2-3605-43A0-81CD-B68659B694C4@lists.zabbadoz.net> <07d67bd5-206c-edd8-7f47-ef2b5c538e01@gjunka.com> <beafbcae807260bf74db591044c44950@gritton.org> <3aaa36dc-c658-5760-c4bb-d0f991834194@gjunka.com> <20160519151914.GL15034@home.opsec.eu> <573349b9-b10d-e976-6d41-1118f5de4b2c@gjunka.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > >> Why would it need to use the nameserver if I am telneting through IP? > > Use telnet -N to avoid DNS lookups. > Oh, great! That worked. It could connect to the web server jail > immediately. So it looks like the problem is with connecting to the DNS > jail, but why? It's not the problem connecting, it's getting an answer. Does your DNS have an answer for 60.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160520112104.GM15034>