From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 16 19:25:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8C21065695 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from k@kevinkevin.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com (mail-yw0-f172.google.com [209.85.211.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF4D8FC0C for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so1323190ywh.27 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:25:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.251.41 with SMTP id y41mr2309796ybh.247.1260991522434; Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:25:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from kevin (not.enough.unixsluts.com [76.10.166.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm531044yxf.5.2009.12.16.11.25.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:25:20 -0800 (PST) From: "Kevin" To: "'Tom Judge'" References: <003001ca7cdc$0b530540$21f90fc0$@com> <4B2924D4.9010207@tomjudge.com> In-Reply-To: <4B2924D4.9010207@tomjudge.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:25:06 -0500 Message-ID: <005301ca7e85$7a992f10$6fcb8d30$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acp+fJqzUx0FFR5mR7CbU/cqTutczQAB2tUw Content-Language: en-us Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: RE: PF Transparent Bridge Firewall + CARP X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:25:23 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Judge > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:20 PM > To: Kevin > Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: PF Transparent Bridge Firewall + CARP > > [router] > | > [------switch 1------] > | | > [FW1]--{pfsync}--[FW2] > | | > [------switch 2------] > | > [clients] My environment would be better described as the following : [router] | [------switch 1 [vlan1]------] | | [FW1]--{pfsync}--[FW2] | | [------switch 1 [vlan2]------] | [clients] Also, I'm assumine em2 is a physical interface, which I probably will have to implement on fw2. Do you forsee problems doing this through vlans instead of two switches? Thanks.