Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:58:10 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Baer <christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines Message-ID: <fel34i$2rnp$1@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> References: <feilee$2m3t$3@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> <86przndoe8.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:39:59 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > YMMV. I run both CURRENT and STABLE on production systems. That is your call to make and allways will be, even if the names are changed. The point just is, that both are not recommended in the documentation. And the -STABLE just doesn't reflekt that. Regards Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fel34i$2rnp$1>