From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 22:33:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F3C16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:33:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FDA643FB1 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:33:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 16534 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 06:33:04 -0000 Received: from niwun.pair.com (HELO localhost) (209.68.2.70) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 06:33:04 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 00:33:03 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <3FBD596E.CE7299BD@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20031121002621.N1924@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20031120200816.1F8C916A4DD@hub.freebsd.org> <20031120154119.M72721@root.org> <3FBD596E.CE7299BD@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/net if_faith.c if_loop.croute.h rtsock.c src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c in_pcb.h in_rmx.c ip_divert.c ip_fw2.c ip_icmp.c ip_input.c ip_output.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 06:33:08 -0000 On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Andre Oppermann wrote: > BTW: Is there a reason why we haven't enabled rfc3390 and inflight by > default? I'm running all my (ISP) servers with it and it gives quite > a boost, especially with http traffic. The inflight stuff is also very > good for connections where the remote side has only limited bandwidth. > It doesn't overload the remote path buffer and keeps the traffic smooth > instead of hitting the packet loss and trying again. > > -- > Andre We should probably put 3390 on soon, it was just me objecting before. I'm not so sure about inflight, though; it probably needs more verification before it's turned on by default. I'm looking forward to dynamic sockbuf sizing though, I think it's a prereq for the inflight code to be well tested. Mike "Silby" Silbersack