From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Feb 2 09:03:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA00614 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:03:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA00558 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 1996 09:03:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from fang.cs.sunyit.edu (fang.cs.sunyit.edu [192.52.220.66]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id IAA00435 for ; Fri, 2 Feb 1996 08:58:04 -0800 Received: (from chuck@localhost) by fang.cs.sunyit.edu (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA24984 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:14:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996 10:14:29 -0500 Message-Id: <199602021514.KAA24984@fang.cs.sunyit.edu> from: chuck@fang.cs.sunyit.edu X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Virtual Memory Implementation Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I was going through the tutorials that were presented at USENIX last month and found a paper (from the "An Introduction to UNIX Kernel Internals" tutorial) called "A New Virtual Memory Implementation for Berkeley UNIX". Is this the Virtual Memory Implementation for 4.4BSD and is it used in FreeBSD? And if not what are the differences? -- Charles Green, PRC Inc. UN*X System Administration 22 Powell Ave. Apt. B UN*X Security & Whitesboro, NY 13492 Programming