Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 May 1998 00:29:03 -0500
From:      Tim Tsai <tim@futuresouth.com>
To:        am@f1.ru
Cc:        Allen Smith <easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu>, bofh@terranova.net, greg@uswest.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SCSI problems?
Message-ID:  <19980512002903.24456@futuresouth.com>
In-Reply-To: <199805112042.AAA18647@px.f1.ru>; from Andrew Maltsev on Tue, May 12, 1998 at 12:42:34AM %2B0400
References:  <9805111615.ZM3202@beatrice.rutgers.edu> <199805112042.AAA18647@px.f1.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 12:42:34AM +0400, Andrew Maltsev wrote:
> > On May 11,  1:43pm, Tim Tsai (possibly) wrote:
> > >   We haven't seen any of the Adaptec problems since we turned off all
> > > the AHC_ options in the kernel configuration file.
> > 
> > Aren't those for EISA, not PCI devices in the first place? That's what
> > the comments in LINT seem to indicate. I've also got an 2940UW,
> > without any AHC_ options, and it hasn't been causing any problems -
> > then again, the machine hasn't been up and running very long.
> 
> Hm..  Powered off it will cause even less problems. Without tagging it's
> too slow for UW and good HD..

  For some of us reliability is far more important than speed.  I bet
you mount your filesystem async too huh?

> Btw, I see no more of that disturbing messages when I added AUTO_EOI1
> and BOUNCE_BUFFERS which I lost during upgrade..

  Hmmm, can somebody tell me why BOUNCE_BUFFERS is applicable here? These
are PCI devices.

  Tim

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980512002903.24456>