Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 19:15:10 -0600 From: RichardH <rh@storm2k.com> To: Adam Weinberger <adam@vectors.cx>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Oh man I'm going to get flamed Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020813190756.00aa2bc8@mail.richardh.wsonline.net> In-Reply-To: <20020814004515.GX2818@vectors.cx> References: <1029285313.20421.187.camel@lohr.digitalglobe.com> <1631.192.168.1.10.1028329834.squirrel@email.unixhideout.com> <20020802194944.R95370-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <2534.192.168.1.10.1028334913.squirrel@email.unixhideout.com> <20020803004445.GA11182@branwen.sfo.geekhouse.net> <1029285313.20421.187.camel@lohr.digitalglobe.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
A) he is an idiot, FBSD was not designed to play quake or other crap on.
B) If he needs to look at a f*ing word doc then either figure out star or
open office or stick with Winshit
C) show me that big ole RH box running as a web server that will run in
excess of 5000 users and not crash, no prob with FBSD if you have a hard
enough system and a good line.
D) FBSD is designed as a server, not to play quake (again), or to look at
hooters on the internet. It provides the hooters to Win users like him :)
Please create and move this to freebsd-crap
At 06:45 PM 8/13/2002, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>this email belongs on freebsd-advocacy, not freebsd-questions nor
>freebsd-chat.
>
>-Adam
>
>
> >> (08.13.2002 @ 1735 PST): John-David Childs said, in 5.9K: <<
> > I was going to let this thread by, but I just can't help it.
> >
> > I've been using FreeBSD for almost eight years. Unfortunately, I
> > haven't been able to contribute as much as I'd like...I keep thinking
> > that someday soon this will change, especially as I get more and more
> > pissed at the holier than thou attitude of most people on the questions
> > and stable lists (as referenced by the example below).
> >
> > If you like FreeBSD because it's a niche OS that no one else you work
> > with knows, or it makes you kewl, or you think it gives you job
> > security, or you like the little devil, press delete now. If you like
> > FreeBSD because the VM rocks, the ports/packages system kicks a$$, or
> > the (until recently) excruciatingly close scrutiny of MFC'd patches and
> > security issues, and you believe you have a civic duty to "show them the
> > way", then you're the audience I'm addressing.
> >
> > Plain and simple...the reason that Linux is used by 10 people (I'm
> > probably massively underestimating) for every FreeBSD user (not counting
> > Apple's marketing campaign) has NOTHING to do with whether it's a better
> > OS. It has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that Linux is easier to
> > install *and maintain* than FreeBSD...and most responses on the
> > questions/stable lists seem to think that's ok ("let the idiots use
> > Linux, the people who know use *BSD"). The problem with that thinking
> > is that if "no one" (term used loosely) uses *BSD, then
> >
> > 1) getting a user-base large enough to effectively trouble-shoot/improve
> > the OS becomes difficult. If an up-and-coming programmer/hacker is
> > looking ahead to which OS is likely to land them a job...it's not going
> > to be Free/Open/NetBSD.
> >
> > 2) getting driver support from commercial entities is next to
> > impossible. If there aren't enough users to justify demand, it isn't
> > going to be (cost) effective to write/support it.
> >
> > 3) getting support to install it as a server OS in medium-large
> > (especially non-ISP) based businesses is next to impossible. While *BSD
> > may have scored some initial successes, and Apple's support of BSD is
> > admirable (but Apple has always been considered a "niche" player, and
> > has fsckd-up more "initiatives" than I can count), most corporate
> > managers whose jobs are on the line will ask themselves "If the shit
> > hits the fan...".
> >
> > Less users = less admins = less programmers = less (corporate) support =
> > less installations = less demand = less users =
> >
> > Granted...I don't want any of the *BSD's to become a RedHat behemoth,
> > but I would like to not have cream pie thrown in my face every time I
> > suggest a FreeBSD server. Five years ago, when *BSD and Linux were
> > roughly neck and neck, it wasn't that hard to sell *BSD on technical
> > merits. Now...it's all about who will support it when I get hit by a
> > truck. How easy is it to set up? How easy is it (compared to Linux,
> > Solaris, SGI, AIX, HPUX, etc) to install and administrate? Can it do
> > clusters? Can it (natively) participate in a SAN? Is there a
> > commercial package for VLAN support? How 'bout a commercial firewall?
> > (Yes, I know and you know that ipf/ipfw/TIS does the job, but once we
> > leave the company the next admin either has to spend days/weeks learning
> > ipf/ipfw or s/he'll trash it immediately, bad-mouthing your stupid
> > decisions all the way up the management chain).
> >
> > And it all starts with a (relatively) easy to use installer (sysinstall
> > has gotten MUCH better, but still has too many ways to get lost in
> > TABS/ESC/whoops and still looks infantile to other text-based
> > installers), and at least the option for a workstation install (not a
> > "instant workstation" port, which could take hours or days to
> > compile/install, but an out-of-the-CD installation of Gnome or KDE with
> > (or without, by choice) popular options (Evolution,
> > OpenOfffice/Abiword+Gnumeric, etc)). And yes, a "dummy-fied" package
> > upgrader like RedHat Updater or MandrakeUpdate (which friggin rocks when
> > you have to update 50 machines across an enterprise).
> >
> > BSD'ers have always been a finicky lot, and have always preferred the
> > RTFM/do-it-yourself approach. That's great...to a point...but
> > eventually will relegate us to the land of A/UX, CP/M, and OS/2 (now
> > there's a niche player). "You decide which is right, and which is an
> > illusion."
> >
> > As requested, replies are redirected to freebsd-chat. I'm going to see
> > about getting some "official" time to work on the installer, or the
> > docs, or both. Replies directly to my address will be /dev/nulled
> > because of the list spam collectors...those of you who "know" will be
> > able to find me :-)
> > --
> >
> > John-David Childs (JC612) Enterprise Internet Solutions
> > Systems Administration 9616 Pecos St, Thornton
> CO 80260
> > & Network Engineering A fourth .sig line is a
> waste!
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 18:44, Jim Mock wrote:
> > > On Fri, 02 Aug 2002 at 20:35:13 -0400, Mike wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Mike wrote:
> > > > >> Stick with videos.. Please. --
> > > > >
> > > > > Very funny. You mean "videoconferencing." And anyways, there is an
> > > > > expression: "The best of both worlds," you know?
> > > >
> > > > "videoconferencing."
> > > > It's two words. Not one.
> > > > I know all about you. Your all about SPAM. Besides, ask a stupid
> > > > question
> > >
> > > That would be "You're". If you're going to flame him for
> > > "videoconferencing" at least spell shit right otherwise you end up
> > > looking even more stupid than you did for flaming him in the first
> > > place.
> > >
> > > > get a stupid answer. you know? At least get a decent name for this
> > > > FreeBSD os you want to chop into linux and make it so any sweaty wife
> > > > beating greaseball can run a "Server"
> > >
> > > Enough already. Take this nonsense off list if you want to have a
> > > bitchfest. There's enough mail that comes through here without having
> > > to scrape through this garbage too.
> > >
> > > - jim
> > >
> > > --
> > > jim mock <mij@soupnazi.org> jim@FreeBSD.org
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> >
> >> end of "Re: Oh man I'm going to get flamed" from John-David Childs <<
>
>
>--
>"Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw."
> -Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch"
>Adam Weinberger
>adam@vectors.cx
>http://vectors.cx
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20020813190756.00aa2bc8>