From owner-freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 14 06:40:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-i386@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CFE16A400 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF4543D45 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:40:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2E6eJpt039201 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:40:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k2E6eJmT039200; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:40:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:40:19 GMT Message-Id: <200603140640.k2E6eJmT039200@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Cc: Subject: Re: i386/75387: [ata] feature request: support of Promise SATAII150 TX4 wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-i386@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= List-Id: I386-specific issues for FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:40:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR i386/75387; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= , bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG, sebastian.holmqvist@gmail.com, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i386/75387: [ata] feature request: support of Promise SATAII150 TX4 wanted Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:36:14 +0100 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > The following patch (against today's 6.x) allows my little Promise controller > to work. Note that my card is a 2-port version of the already listed 4-port > one (PDC40775). Here is the resulting dmesg.boot (I don't have any SATA300 > drives here): I should work just as well before as the pdc40775 chip has the exact same PCI id as yours and its already in there: #define ATA_PDC40775 0x3d73105a Are you saying that the original code doesn't work but the patched one does ? Except for the different names printed in the boot messages there is no difference in how they are treated whatsower... -Søren > Index: ata-chipset.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /meow/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c,v > retrieving revision 1.126.2.10 > diff -U2 -r1.126.2.10 ata-chipset.c > --- ata-chipset.c 1 Mar 2006 18:36:43 -0000 1.126.2.10 > +++ ata-chipset.c 13 Mar 2006 20:36:19 -0000 > @@ -2944,4 +2944,5 @@ > { ATA_PDC20579, 0, PRMIO, PRCMBO2, ATA_SA150, "PDC20579" }, > { ATA_PDC20771, 0, PRMIO, PRCMBO2, ATA_SA300, "PDC20771" }, > + { ATA_PDC20775, 0, PRMIO, PRCMBO2, ATA_SA300, "PDC20775" }, > { ATA_PDC40775, 0, PRMIO, PRCMBO2, ATA_SA300, "PDC40775" }, > { ATA_PDC20617, 0, PRMIO, PRPATA, ATA_UDMA6, "PDC20617" }, > Index: ata-pci.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /meow/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.h,v > retrieving revision 1.49.2.7 > diff -U2 -r1.49.2.7 ata-pci.h > --- ata-pci.h 19 Feb 2006 15:18:23 -0000 1.49.2.7 > +++ ata-pci.h 14 Mar 2006 00:05:43 -0000 > @@ -225,4 +225,6 @@ > #define ATA_PDC20575 0x3d75105a > #define ATA_PDC20579 0x3574105a > +#define ATA_PDC20580 0x3570105a > +#define ATA_PDC20775 0x3d73105a > #define ATA_PDC20771 0x3570105a > #define ATA_PDC40518 0x3d18105a