From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 19:12:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BB116A41C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A2D43D49; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:12:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:12:13 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id BFD3C5D07; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:12:13 -0700 (PDT) To: Scott Long In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:46:35 MDT." <42A8483B.3070001@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:12:13 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20050609191213.BFD3C5D07@ptavv.es.net> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Mark Murray , obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc group master.passwd X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:12:15 -0000 > Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:46:35 -0600 > From: Scott Long > Sender: owner-cvs-all@freebsd.org > > Mark Murray wrote: > > "David O'Brien" writes: > > > >>>It's not a FreeBSD convention. If the underscore serves no other > >>>purpose than satisfying an OpenBSD convention, it should go. > >> > >>Agreed. > > > > > > Also agreed. > > > > M > > -- > > Mark Murray > > iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH > > Disagreed. It sounds like OPenBSD has a useful convention. Even though > it's not the traditional FreeBSD way, it still has merit. I also disagree. It's a very useful convention. Just because OpenBSD thought it up first is not a reason for us to use it. Nor does it require converting existing names (or even use it in the future, although I would like to see it. I still miss the old VMS convention that names that include a '$' are reserved unto the system. (Of course, '$' would not be a good convention for a Unix type system.) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634