Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:36:24 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Randall Stewart <rrs@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r249848 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <20130425123624.GK76816@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <DB44C962-1DD7-4AB8-AB3D-641C7FCED6F2@lakerest.net> References: <201304241830.r3OIUWiZ073002@svn.freebsd.org> <20130425082458.GG76816@glebius.int.ru> <DB44C962-1DD7-4AB8-AB3D-641C7FCED6F2@lakerest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:40:04AM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: R> I like the idea Gleb.. R> R> I myself had been thinking that it was rather strange that R> we used dst for both the gateway and destination.. R> R> this is a much cleaner (and safer) solution. I'll commit it to head then. I've seen you merged your patch to 8 and 9, that's right, let's have the less disrupting patch merged and a cleaner solution in head. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130425123624.GK76816>