Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 May 2009 16:55:15 -0300
From:      Renato Botelho <>
To:        Giorgos Keramidas <>
Cc:, Paul Stewart <>
Subject:   Re: 7.1 to 7.2 upgrade question
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <87ljpbwi5v.fsf@kobe.laptop>
References:  <000001c9cd85$afe53b70$0fafb250$@org> <87ljpbwi5v.fsf@kobe.laptop>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
<> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 May 2009 09:30:41 -0400, "Paul Stewart" <> =
>> Hi there.
>> As I'm slowly getting used to FreeBSD (again), I recently upgraded
>> three boxes to 7.2-RELEASE. =A0Two of them were running 7.1-RELEASE and
>> one was running 7.2-RC2 ..
>> Anyways, I used freebsd-update to upgrade - in my previous experiences
>> I would have to do a "make world" etc. etc.
>> Which method is most preferred - source or binary upgrading? =A0I don't
>> mind source upgrading but is it really necessary anymore if using
>> freebsd-update on a regular basis?
> If you don't need local patches or a custom kernel, and you can use the
> GENERIC kernel configured to match your hardware setup, then it probably
> makes a lot of sense to use freebsd-update. =A0It will usually be much
> faster than compiling everything from source.

I don't know if it's officially supported, but I did an hybrid upgrade
using freebsd-update for the base and building the custom kernel
from sources, it worked fine and is still much faster than build

Renato Botelho

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>