Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:41:11 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/ddb db_ps.c src/sys/i386/i386 genassym.c src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_fork.c kern_mutex.c kern_proc.c kern_thread.c sched_4bsd.c sched_ule.c subr_smp.c subr_witness.c src/sys/sys proc.h Message-ID: <XFMail.20030410134111.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200304101735.h3AHZjPI096029@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10-Apr-2003 Julian Elischer wrote: > julian 2003/04/10 10:35:45 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/ddb db_ps.c > sys/i386/i386 genassym.c > sys/kern init_main.c kern_fork.c kern_mutex.c > kern_proc.c kern_thread.c sched_4bsd.c > sched_ule.c subr_smp.c subr_witness.c > sys/sys proc.h > Log: > Move the _oncpu entry from the KSE to the thread. > The entry in the KSE still exists but it's purpose will change a bit > when we add the ability to lock a KSE to a cpu. Why not add a ke_pincpu to hold the bound CPU? Since KSE's are in theory a kind of virtual CPU abstraction the thread really seems to be the wrong place for this information. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030410134111.jhb>