Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:43:06 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .sh check for numeric content Message-ID: <20100625044306.GB9228@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20100624175120.08ecd1ee@scorpio> References: <4C22B3D7.6070102@comclark.com> <20100624033257.2D074BEA6@kev.msw.wpafb.af.mil> <20100624050832.06ef2a46@scorpio> <20100624161439.GD557@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20100624123815.01307f51@scorpio> <4C23CB5D.1030902@comclark.com> <20100624175120.08ecd1ee@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 05:51:20PM -0400, Jerry wrote: >=20 > In any case, as I previously posted, it was left up to the OP to decide > if the proposed solution was suitable for their needs. After reading > all of the babble concerning what should be a relatively easy operation, > perhaps the OP might want to consider switching to Bash. If we're going to start telling him what language to use, we might as well tell him to use an actual *programming* language (e.g. Perl). Otherwise, perhaps we should try to stick to what he wants to use. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkwkM9kACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXZ+QCfRU304LsQlf40g9jaQZ/pWhRg uYYAoJ2ZpDtdmhsVhXki7xf2lUD9JFA8 =iYH4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100625044306.GB9228>