Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:08:45 +0700 (ICT) From: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Blocking undesirable domains using BIND Message-ID: <200712280508.lBS58jLo022219@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750712272037x594336efndcd136ee2101e3e7@mail.gmail.com> (mkhitrov@gmail.com) References: <26ddd1750712271246j14795cf3wf8e9727f0f7cc148@mail.gmail.com> <47744048.6020202@daleco.biz> <26ddd1750712272037x594336efndcd136ee2101e3e7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Again, I'm not trying to convince you otherwise or say that using > BIND is a bad idea. It's just that I'm curious because we use > Squid for this sort of thing, and I was wondering why BIND instead? I think another issue is that Squid will only filter HTTP/FTP connections, while DNS would allow to filter any type of traffic that would try to go to places with a bad name. Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712280508.lBS58jLo022219>