From owner-freebsd-mobile Thu Nov 20 21:21:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA13904 for mobile-outgoing; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:21:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-mobile) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA13898 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:21:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA23828; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 22:21:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id WAA13098; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 22:21:11 -0700 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 22:21:11 -0700 Message-Id: <199711210521.WAA13098@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ken Key Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot floppies for 2.2.5-STABLE that speak PCMCIA? In-Reply-To: <199711210408.XAA26400@duncan.cs.utk.edu> References: <199711202148.OAA11511@mt.sri.com> <199711210408.XAA26400@duncan.cs.utk.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > version and branching terminology. So is it accurate to say that > 2.2.5-STABLE == the head of the cvsup RELENG_2_2 tag? Yes. > Does the > 2.2-STABLE that Brain Handy meantion == 2.2.5-STABLE or are they > actually separate branches? 2.2-STABLE became 2.2.5-STABLE as soon as 2.2.5-RELEASE was made (or soon thereafter). > > I don't think there have been any SNAP's that have been made since 2.2.5 > > was released, so any 2.2 SNAPS won't have any post-2.2.5R changes in > > them. > > releng22.freebsd.com and current.freebsd.com have new 2.2-*-SNAP daily > directories for the past few weeks. Your statement above makes it > sound like they are not the result of the RELENG_2_2 tag at the time > of the auto checkout/build but just 2.2.5-RELEASE? But I'm building > from source, so it doesn't matter to me. I had heard that both machines were 'down', so was not aware that they had started up again. Nate