Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Dec 2013 17:35:35 +0100
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeFreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] recursive dependency registration is gone for pkgng users
Message-ID:  <20131228163535.GS40122@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <20131229.013122.533749649.yasu@utahime.org>
References:  <20131228145250.GP40122@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20131229.013122.533749649.yasu@utahime.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Wty5iWagpjJlozQq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 01:31:22AM +0900, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
> Subject: [HEADSUP] recursive dependency registration is gone for pkgng us=
ers
> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:52:50 +0100
>=20
> > as a side effect,
> > tinderbox and poudriere users do need to rebuild all their packages from
> > scratch.
>=20
> Does this mean rebuilding is necessary only if either tinderbox or
> poudriere are used, or all packages have to be rebuilt anyway if pkgng
> is used?
>=20
Only when building with tinderbox/poudriere, people bulding other ways are =
safe
and the packages will on the flow drop their useless dependencies

regards,
Bapt

--Wty5iWagpjJlozQq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlK+/dcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwsSgCfQr+abOu9IRwklECgooZ5PN8k
WQYAn00ckFPRva89uQHH/C1csdugYKhK
=d9tN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Wty5iWagpjJlozQq--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131228163535.GS40122>