Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 1 May 2002 14:11:51 +0200
From:      Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
To:        Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Cc:        Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Bug in pthread_cancel()
Message-ID:  <20020501121151.GR66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10204302325260.7256-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
References:  <200204302302.g3UN2aS89479@arch20m.dellroad.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10204302325260.7256-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20020501 05:45], Daniel Eischen (eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com) wrote:
>Hmm, what about just bypassing the pthread_cancel() if the
>thread is already in the process of exiting?

Makes sense to me.

And the testcase in the PR is solved adequately with it?

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono
asmodai@wxs.nl, finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org
http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/ | http://www.tendra.org/
Everything Zen, I don't think so...

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020501121151.GR66061>