From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 4 09:09:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id F018C16A468; Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 09:09:51 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Rong-En Fan Message-ID: <20070704090951.GB33211@FreeBSD.org> References: <200707040506.l6456pxV090625@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707040506.l6456pxV090625@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-p2p/verlihub Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:09:52 -0000 On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 05:06:51AM +0000, Rong-En Fan wrote: > rafan 2007-07-04 05:06:51 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > net-p2p/verlihub Makefile distinfo > Log: > - Set WRKSRC to remove ugly post-extract hack [1] Does not seem right to me. The error would appear on install stage (more specifically, apply-slist one). Please see my reply to Andrew's mail. Whenever you see a hack, it might be put there deliberately. I was also under impression that we normally give comitter a chance to backout their changes themself, no? ./danfe